Updated: 23 June 2026
Corrections Policy — United States
American Casino Bonuses aims for accuracy in every comparison, review, and licensing-context note we publish. Casino terms, game libraries, and bonus structures change often, and we rely on attentive readers to help us catch drift between what we've published and what's currently true. This page explains what we consider a reportable error and how we handle a report once it reaches us. For the United States audience, that distinction supports licensing context and dispute routes.
What counts as a reportable error
A reportable error is a factual claim that is verifiably wrong at the time you read it: an incorrect wagering requirement, a mischaracterized licensing jurisdiction, a dead or misdirected link, or a mobile feature we described that no longer exists in the app. Matters of editorial opinion, such as how we rank or score a casino, are not treated as factual errors. The editorial context for United States places this detail beside licensing context and dispute routes.
Send the exact URL
Always include the full, exact web address of the page you're reporting rather than a general site name. If the error appears in a specific table row, screenshot, or paragraph, tell us which one so we don't have to guess. The United States comparison keeps licensing context and dispute routes in view.
Include supporting evidence
A link to the operator's current terms page, a dated screenshot from the casino's own site or app, or a citation to a licensing register helps us confirm the discrepancy quickly. Reports without any supporting reference take longer to verify and may be queued behind better-documented ones. For the United States audience, that distinction supports licensing context and dispute routes.
How we check sources
Before making a change, we compare your report against the casino's current published terms or app state and, where relevant, publicly available licensing information. We do not treat a single unverified claim as sufficient on its own if it conflicts with what we can independently confirm. This matters in the United States context when considering licensing context and dispute routes.
Material changes versus minor wording
A material change alters the substance of what a reader would understand, such as a corrected bonus amount, a fixed licensing reference, or a repaired broken link. Minor wording adjustments, such as tightening a sentence for clarity, are made routinely and are not separately logged as corrections. The practical emphasis for United States stays on licensing context and dispute routes.
Dating corrected content
When a material correction is made, we note the date of that update on the affected page so returning readers can see the content has changed since original publication. The United States comparison keeps licensing context and dispute routes in view.
Temporary publication states
Occasionally a page may carry a temporary note, an interim caveat, or a partial removal while we finish confirming a report. This is a normal part of the review process rather than an admission that the original content was wrong. The local reading for United States gives priority to licensing context and dispute routes.
When a report is not actioned
Not every report results in a change. If we cannot verify the claimed error, if the underlying casino terms are genuinely ambiguous, or if the report concerns editorial judgment rather than fact, we will decline to make the requested change and may say so if you asked for a reply. For the United States comparison, the editorial lens is licensing context and dispute routes.
Fair and supported criticism
We welcome well-supported critical feedback about a casino's practices, even when it's unflattering, provided it's tied to verifiable facts. Criticism alone is never removed simply because it is negative. Only unsupported or inaccurate claims are corrected. Its relevance to United States is considered through licensing context and dispute routes.
Urgent security-related reports
If your report concerns a security issue, such as a page seemingly serving malicious content or a spoofed link mimicking a casino brand, please flag this clearly as urgent so it can be reviewed promptly. This matters in the United States context when considering licensing context and dispute routes.
Personal disputes with a casino
This corrections process exists to fix our published content, not to intervene in an individual dispute over your account, bonus, or withdrawal with a casino operator. Those matters must be raised directly with the operator or, where applicable, its licensing body. This matters in the United States context when considering licensing context and dispute routes.
Privacy of your report
Any personal details you include in a correction report are used only to evaluate and respond to that report, consistent with our privacy policy, and are not published alongside the correction itself. Its relevance to United States is considered through licensing context and dispute routes.
A straightforward process
Send the URL, the claimed error, and any supporting evidence, and we'll review it against current sources before deciding whether a correction is warranted. The United States comparison keeps licensing context and dispute routes in view.